To be honest, it's not that I don’t use burst mode—it’s just that it doesn’t give me the same satisfaction as capturing a photo with a single click. Sure, when you shoot 15 to 30 frames per second, you're almost guaranteed to end up with at least one good image out of 100. But if you stop to think about the fact that you needed 100 shots just to pick one, to me, it feels a bit like cheating. The funny part is that even with burst mode, you can still end up without a single good photo—and a memory card full of junk to sort through at the end of the day.
Yes, I do use burst mode when photographing birds in flight, because it increases the odds of getting one perfectly in focus. The same goes for sports photography—it’s nearly impossible to capture the exact peak moment of the action in just one click, and also have it perfectly sharp.
![]() |
Captured using a burst at 1/2500. ISO 12800. |
But even so, it doesn’t give me the same pleasure. To me, it’s like bringing a machine gun to a hunt. Where’s the fun in that? One bullet, one kill. I treat photography the same way: one click, one perfect photo.
And speaking of hunting—if hunters would trade their guns for cameras, oh God, we’d be living in a perfect world.
![]() |
Captured using one click. |
I enjoy watching dozens of videos from other wildlife photographers, and whenever I hear the rapid-fire sound of burst mode, I can’t help but smile and think, no wonder they end up with such great shots.
But for me, the joy I get from a single, intentional click would be lost if I had to sort through hundreds of images just to find one good one. I feel that when you press the shutter once—when you really feel the moment—you remember it forever. But with burst mode, it’s easy to forget the exact instant it happened, buried among so many frames.
Burst mode just isn’t for me.