Thursday, July 24, 2025

ChatGPT, wonderful tool for photographers.

 I ran an experiment with ChatGPT to check its logic picking lenses for my next trip. Here is what I asked:

From these lenses, which 2 would you pick to travel with: Canon EF70-200mm L, Canon EF28-80mm L or Tamron 28-300mm? 

And here is the response: 

For travel, I’d pick the Tamron 28-300mm and the Canon EF 70-200mm L — here's why:

1. Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3

  • Ideal for travel: One-lens solution covering wide to telephoto.

  • Lightweight and versatile: You can shoot landscapes, street, portraits, and even some wildlife without switching lenses.

  • Compact: Compared to carrying multiple L lenses, it’s easier to manage while walking or hiking.

2. Canon EF 70-200mm L

  • Excellent optical quality: Razor-sharp images, fast focus, great for portraits and distant subjects.

  • Durability: Built like a tank, perfect for serious travel and challenging weather.

  • Pairs well with the Tamron: You can use the Tamron most of the time and switch to the 70-200mm when you want top-quality shots, especially for wildlife or compression shots.


Why Not the 28-80mm L?

  • Great image quality, but...

  • Too much overlap with the Tamron’s range.

  • Less useful on its own unless you're only doing general street and landscape photography — and even then, the Tamron can cover that plus more.


If weight is critical:

Only take the Tamron 28-300mm. It covers almost everything, and you’ll save space and effort.

If image quality and reliability are more important, and you're okay carrying two lenses:
Tamron 28-300mm + Canon 70-200mm L is a powerful combo.

End of the Response. 

As you can see, it makes a lot of sense and the response is technically correct. The Tamron 28-300 while is not that sharp, it's a decent lens that I have used before in some occasions. Here is one of the pictures I took using this lens. 

20240929-R6I-100016

  I think that I'll follow ChatGPT advise. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam will be deleted, do not waste your time.

You are wrong